Lite om USA:s/Nato:s och medias "attackhistoria"
Varför inte erinra oss en del av vad som sades i media och av västerländska politiker inför attackerna på Irak och senare på Libyen och jämföra med resultaten:
The Truth Exposed – Muammar Gaddafi (utlagd 3/3 2013)
/Kerstin
Länkar:
– Libya Continues Federalist Fragmentation; Cyrenaica Unveils Government. nsnbc international, 26/10 2013 (citat: While the new administration reportedly includes tribal representatives, there are no women in the team. The situation of women with regards to women’s rights and women´s participation in Libyan politics has deteriorated alarmingly since 2011.)
– The Libyan Puzzle in the Scramble for Africa, Sam Muhho, Global Research 24/10 2013 (Citat: Libya has recently been ravished by increasing internal strife and ethno-tribal divisions that was the continuation of NATO’s systematic destruction of the nation-state in 2011.)
– A Victory for the Libyan People? The Top Ten Myths in the War Against Libya, Mximilian C. Forte, counterpunch.org 31/8 2011 (Citat: I wish to dissent from this circle of acclamation, and remind readers of the role of ideologically-motivated fabrications of “truth” that were used to justify, enable, enhance, and motivate the war against Libya—and to emphasize how damaging the practical effects of those myths have been to Libyans, and to all those who favoured peaceful, non-militarist solutions…….
Just a few days after the street protests began, on February 21 the very quick to defect Libyan deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, Ibrahim Dabbashi, stated: “We are expecting a real genocide in Tripoli. The airplanes are still bringing mercenaries to the airports”. This is excellent: a myth that is composed of myths. With that statement he linked three key myths together—the role of airports (hence the need for that gateway drug of military intervention: the no-fly zone), the role of “mercenaries” (meaning, simply, black people), and the threat of “genocide” (geared toward the language of the UN’s doctrine of the Responsibility to Protect)…..
What foreign military intervention did do, however, was to enable the actual genocidal violence that has been routinely sidelined until only very recently: the horrific violence against African migrants and black Libyans, singled out solely on the basis of their skin colour.)
08/12 13:14 at 13:14
Jinge bedömer USAs möjligheter på http://jinge.se/allmant/nar-gar-kina-om-usa-som-forbereder-krig-mot-kina.htm